means delegating by default
to whoever decides in your place.
Executive committees make AI decisions without explicit criteria.
Most AI decisions made at board level are made by analogy with past technology decisions, by reaction to competitor initiatives, or under pressure from internal teams that understand the subject better than the leadership.
None of these decision modes is satisfactory. The technology analogy ignores that AI creates dependencies of a new type. Competitive reaction produces imitation without added value. Downward delegation shifts decision-making power without structuring it.
What an AI decision framework must cover.
What value does this decision create for our specific organisation? Not in general, not for competitors. For us, with our business model and constraints. A decision that cannot answer this question is not ready.
What dependencies does this decision create? Towards whom? On what terms? What is reversibility in 3 years? What is the estimated exit cost? These questions must be asked before every significant AI decision.
After this decision, who controls what? Does the organisation retain control of its critical decisions? Human oversight is not a regulatory obligation. It is a strategic criterion.
What is the EU AI Act risk level of this system? What obligations apply? These questions complement the first three : they do not replace them.