Choosing an AI vendor without strategic criteria means creating a dependency you cannot reverse in 3 years. We help you choose before the choice is imposed on you.
Most AI vendor selections are conducted by technical teams on criteria of performance, cost, and integration. These criteria are necessary. They are insufficient.
The missing criteria are strategic: what is the exit cost in 3 years? Which data will the vendor use for its models? Which contractual clauses can be modified unilaterally? These questions determine your situation in 3 to 5 years, not 3 to 5 months.
What is the contract exit procedure? On what timeline? At what cost? What happens to your data and fine-tunings when you leave? A vendor that cannot answer these questions clearly is a vendor that doesn't want you to leave.
Does your data feed the vendor's model training? Under what conditions? Is there an explicit non-training clause? If this clause is not in the contract, it does not exist.
Which contract elements can the vendor modify unilaterally? Pricing, SLAs, usage terms? Major AI vendors have significantly modified their terms multiple times in 18 months.
If this vendor raised its prices 50% tomorrow, what realistic alternative do you have? In what timeframe could you migrate? This evaluation must happen before signing, not when the question becomes urgent.
Selecting an AI vendor creates a dependency that can become strategic in 12 to 18 months. An AI vendor strategy integrates five criteria beyond technical ones: contractual reversibility, conditions for use of proprietary data, pricing terms stability, existence of realistic alternatives, and alignment with the operator's EU AI Act obligations.
The distinction between AI vendor and AI partner is important: a partner accepts negotiating non-training data clauses, clear exit conditions, and service guarantees. A vendor refusing these clauses signals that contract conditions are designed to create dependency.
At tointelligence, we observe that organisations that structure their selection with strategic criteria from the start negotiate better conditions and maintain real options at 3 years. Those that select purely on technical criteria find themselves in a lock-in situation at first renewal.
We intervene on ongoing or upcoming selections to integrate strategic criteria before dependencies are created.
let's talk· frequently asked questions